The Captive Media in the USA: By Dr. Syed Ehtisham

A cynical, mercenary, demagogic press will produce in time a people as

base as itself.” – Joseph Pulitzer*

         A media system set up to serve the needs of the Financial

Institutions will not serve the interests of the majority of population.

Media ownership, since the Bill Clinton deregulation, has been greatly

concentrated and globalised. 

*1. *Its relationship with the Neo-liberal global economy has been solemnised. It is as corrupt as any policy making medium in the West.  Public service broadcasting has all but collapsed. The remaining ones are actually in the grip of barely disguised corporate finance. Culture has been commercialised. The first amendment of the US constitution has been perverted to offer the corporations the rank of individuals and corporate leaders would not be held responsible for their acts. According to the latest US Supreme Court ruling, corporations can spend as much as they want in lobbying; it reinforces the Multinational Corporate (MNC) power and reach.

*2.*Internet, touted as beyond the reach of Multinational corporations is being incorporated in the commercial media systems.

3.*Bill Clinton’ s deregulation allowed the takeover of CBS by Viacom. AOL swallowed Time Warner in the largest merger in history (valued at $160 billion). Time Warner merged its music operations with EMI, leaving 90% of the music market in the hand of four entities. The Tribune Company bought Times Mirror, making every major newspaper chain a part of a large media monopoly.

*4.*With corporate intrusions, the Public system-National Public Radio and Public Broadcasting System is also now within the ideological confines of advertisement supported, profit-driven system. Local commercial media are consistently reluctant to offer critical analysis of powerful local interests, which are the major advertisers.

5.*In the spring of 2000, the Boston Herald suspended its consumer affairs columnist, Robin Washington for a series of articles on Fleet-Boston financial corporation, which not only advertised in the Herald, but also loaned funds to it. He was eventually reinstated because of public protest, but also because he was one of the four African American staffers in the large 235 person editorial staff.

*6.*Commercial media tend to provide favorable coverage to politicians, who offer them subsidies and favorable regulations. For his book, The Media Monopoly Ben H. Bagdilkian used the Freedom of Information Act to unearth the information that major media promised Nixon support in the 1972 reelection campaign if he supported the Newspaper Preservation Act

*7.*Corporations routinely get their local station managers to call on their congressmen to support the corporate position on media legislation. A top executive of the Hearst Corporation, owner of San Francisco Examiner, it was revealed under deposition, had offered editorial support to Mayor Willie Brown of San Francisco, then up for reelection, if Brown would give his official blessing to Hearstâ’s buying San Francisco Herald.

*8.*The death of John F. Kennedy Jr, his wife and her sister in a plane crash was treated by the media as, “The return of the Messiah or intelligent life on Mars”.  *9. *The Seattle protest during a meeting of WTO four months later, was virtually ignored till the meetings had to be closed down.

*10. *Monica Lewinsky, who had a scandalous affair with President Clinton in the White House and O.J. Simpson a football player who was convicted of murder (and is currently being tried for rape, got much more coverage. A few outstanding journalists produce good analytic pieces, but they are published as a token of impartiality and are swamped by pro-capitalist writings. *

11.*The issue of military spending does not find adequate coverage as it offers corporate welfare, whereas spending on education and health are vigorously criticized. *12. *The widening gulf between the richest 10% who own 76% of the nation’s net

worth,

(*13) *half of which is owned by the richest 1%, whose income went up steeply in 1980’s and 1990’s

(*14) *and the poorest 60% whose income went down in the same period is not mentioned in the commercial press.

15. On the other hand the boom of the 1990’s is vociferously lauded.

*16.*The prison population in the US has more than doubled since 1980’s; it has five times more prisoners per capita than Canada and seven times more than Western Europe. *With 5% of the world’s population, it has 25% of the worlds’ prisoner population.* Nearly 90% are held for nonviolent offenses and cannot be tried as the legal system is swamped.

*17.*Capitalism has found a new source of income in privatization of jail service. A considerable number are actually innocent of any crime. 

*18. *About 50% are African Americans, who are about thirteen and a half per cent of the US population. The sentences are class based. In 2000, a Texan black young man got sixteen years for stealing a candy bar, while executives of Hoffman-LaRoche, who were found guilty of conspiring to eliminate competition in the vitamin industry, characterized by the Justice Department as the biggest anti-trust case in history, causing incalculable billions of dollars of losses to the public, were fined $75,000 to $350,000 and jail terms of three to four months.

19. Corporations are after the Internet. AOL made a deal with Time Warner to keep internet from competing with media. Thanks to Bill Clinton, we have an oligopoly of five corporations controlling 90% of international media of communications. Before him, eighty corporations owned the media.

*20.* Vital decisions are made behind closed doors outside the purview of public discourse. Federal Communications Commission wanted to offer diversity by means of Micro-radio, which could be used to transmit a high quality signal to large metropolitan areas. The Radio lobby went to work at the House of Representatives and got it to scotch the plan in April, 2000.

*21.* An article in New York Times in May 2000, regulators in Clinton years have signed off on big mergers, which would have been unthinkable a generation ago”. Clinton went further than Reagan did and Bush II could.

*22.* Corporate capitalism has consistently subverted the liberal tradition, leaving them with little choice between becoming openly anti-capitalist or caving in. Most of them have adopted the latter course. All the so called liberal champions, Carter, Clinton and Gore have built their careers in the service of corporations. The law Professor Lawrence Lessig, acknowledged authority on the Internet, asserted that it was the right of people to adopt whatever system they liked the best. Since we all dislike government interventionism, we could not demand intervention in the corporate drive to internet domination.

*23.* The main faction of conservatives in the US (and the West in general) is a proponent of the right of corporations to dominate the World without popular protest. The other is the religious establishment, which works assiduously to link evangelical Christianity to the agenda of the pro-market right.

*24. * Before the 1940 s, a substantial number of conservatives were against large military, secret police and intelligence establishments. Today the topic is off limits.

*25. *They now comprehend the utility of the services for controlling 75% of the physical assets of the world. Offering invaluable assistance to the capitalist society, the corporate media is indispensable to depoliticisation of the society. The coverage NGOs get is just one facet of the scheme.

*26* Jean Kirkpatrick, the arch deaconess of Neo-liberalism justified the US support of brutal totalitarian societies on the ground that they protected capitalism.

*27. *We are fortunately entering a new era of politicization. Students unions are being re-energized and protests are exploding.

*28.* And it is not just the students who are waking up. Movements against police brutality, racist discrimination, women’s rights, environmental depredation, International Monetary Fund, World Trade Organisation, and the World Bank machinations on behalf of corporations and sweat shops are gathering strength.

*29.*  Ref:

1.      Telecommunication act of 1996, introduced by Larry Pressler, March

13, 1995, passed October 12, 1995, signed into law by Bill Clinton February

8, 1996 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telecommunications_Act_of_1996.

2.      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_personhood_debate

3.      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_media

4.      ibid 1

5.      medialifemagazine.com/ex/reporter-cbs-news-reluctant-criticize/.

6.     www.bostonphoenix.com/archives/features/00/05/04/DON_P_QUOTE_ME.html

7.      www.timesfreepress.com/news/2012/feb/25/corrupting/super/pacs/

8. www.sfgate.com/news/article/Full-Text-Of-Judge-Walker-s-Ruling-2712167.php

9. www.bing. com/videos/search? =jfk+plane+crash+treated+like+a+huge+media+event&qpvt

10.   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1999_Seattle_WTO_protests

11.radgeek.com/gt/2010/05/13/free-market-anti-capitalism-is-this-all-just-a-semantic-debate/

12.   www.navalreview.ca/2014/05/federal-defence-spending  -versus-federal-health-and-education-spending/

13.www.holtz.org/Library/Social%20Science/Economics/Economic%20Inequality%20in%20the%20United%20States.htm

14.   Ibid

15.   money.cnn.com/2012/09/12/news/economy/median-income-poverty/index.html

16.   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1990s_United_States_boom

17.www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/07/federal-prison-population-n-2638844.html

18.   Ibid

19.   www.commondreams.org/views/041100-106.htm;

www.lawyersandsettlements.com/settlements/03452/vitamin.html?opt=b&utm_expid=3607522-6.CQR-xUqRR1-q6QXM51tyxA.1&utm_referrer=htpp%3A%2F%

<http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/settlements/03452/vitamin.html?opt=b&utm_expid=3607522-6.CQR-xUqRR1-q6QXM51tyxA.1&utm_referrer=htpp%3A%2F%25>

20.   Ibid 1

21.   Ac-journal.org/journal/vol3/Iss3.rogue4/highspeed.html

22.   Ibid 1.

23.   www.econlib.org/library/Columns/y2003/Lessigcopyright.html

24. www.christianpost.com/news/an-anti-cronyism-and-free-market-agenda-119209/

25. www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/the-invisible-government-revealed/

26.   www.ngopulse.org/category/tags/media-coverage

27.   En.wikipedia.org/wiki/Totalitarianism

<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Totalitarianism>

28. www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer/sheet/wp/2014/04/15/testing-resistance-movement-exploding-around-country/

29.   www.twnside.org.sg/title/peop-cn.ht.

S. Akhtar Ehtisham M.D

I No Longer Believe in a Jewish State-By Peter Beinart

(it was obvious for long time that two state solution is dead as dictated by reality on the ground. Palestinians and their leaders are still in denials. Palestinians will be better of demanding equal rights as citizens of state of Israel rather then wasting blood and resources on two state solution. Peter Beinart is a journalist, supporter of Palestinian rights and two state solution-f.sheikh)

For decades I argued for separation between Israelis and Palestinians. Now, I can imagine a Jewish home in an equal state

I was 22 in 1993 when Yitzhak Rabin and Yasir Arafat shook hands on the White House lawn to officially begin the peace process that many hoped would create a Palestinian state alongside Israel. I’ve been arguing for a two-state solution — first in late-night bull sessions, then in articles and speeches — ever since.

I believed in Israel as a Jewish state because I grew up in a family that had hopscotched from continent to continent as diaspora Jewish communities crumbled. I saw Israel’s impact on my grandfather and father, who were never as happy or secure as when enveloped in a society of Jews. And I knew that Israel was a source of comfort and pride to millions of other Jews, some of whose families had experienced traumas greater than my own.

One day in early adulthood, I walked through Jerusalem, reading street names that catalog Jewish history, and felt that comfort and pride myself. I knew Israel was wrong to deny Palestinians in the West Bank citizenship, due process, free movement and the right to vote in the country in which they lived. But the dream of a two-state solution that would give Palestinians a country of their own let me hope that I could remain a liberal and a supporter of Jewish statehood at the same time.

Events have now extinguished that hope.

About 640,000 Jewish settlers now live in East Jerusalem and the West Bank, and the Israeli and American governments have divested Palestinian statehood of any real meaning. The Trump administration’s peace plan envisions an archipelago of Palestinian towns, scattered across as little as 70 percent of the West Bank, under Israeli control. Even the leaders of Israel’s supposedly center-left parties don’t support a viable, sovereign Palestinian state. The West Bank hosts Israel’s newest medical school.

Full Article

History tells us that ideological ‘purity spirals’ rarely end well-Katrin Redfern

Nobody is more dangerous than he who imagines himself pure in heart, for his purity, by definition, is unassailable.

Author James Baldwin’s words, written in the America of the late 1950s, captures perfectly a feeling in the air that is currently troubling public discourse in many Western countries. Increasingly, questions once treated as complicated inquiries requiring scrutiny and nuance are being reduced to moral absolutes. Just look at Trumpism.

This follows a now dismally familiar pattern: two camps are identified, the acceptable “for” and the demonised “against”. The latter are cast beyond the pale, cancelled and trolled. Identity politics has become a secular religion and, like any strict sect, apostates are severely punished.

This can lead to a “purity spiral”, with the more extreme opinion the more rewarded in a pattern of increasing escalation. Nuance and debate are the casualties, and a kind of moral feeding frenzy results.

Are purity spirals inevitable? It is natural for humans to form “in” and “out” groups. Identifying a common enemy is often the key to group solidarity. Nationalist politicians and the marketing teams who serve them know how effective such strategies can be with ill-informed electorates. Equally, if an individual can manifest virtues valued by the group, this fosters a sense of self-worth and belonging.

Unsurprisingly, we have been here before. History demonstrates the ease with which ordinary people commit atrocious acts, particularly during crises. When you believe you are morally superior, when you dehumanise those you disagree with, you can justify almost anything. Take the example of one of the most consequential purity spirals, the Puritan Revolution in 17th-century England.

Full article

posted by f.sheikh