A Serenade of Self-Destruction

“A Serenade of Self-Destruction “ By Sophia Chawla

 

March 3rd, 2012. KARACHI, PAKISTAN: A deadly bomb blast ripped through shops and dwellings in a Shia village, killing about 49 Shia Muslims and wounding 135. We see here, once again, an example of the onrushing Sunni-Shia conflict in Pakistan. Now, my knowledge about the causes behind this conflict is highly lacking (except for the fact that, like all other Sunni-Shia conflicts in the Muslim world, there is a dispute over the heir of the Prophet Muhammad), but such conflict further exhumes the troubled role of religion in the founding foundations of Pakistan.

Pakistan was founded in the year 1947 by Karachi-native Qaid-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah. A Shia and “non-devout” Muslim himself (people ascribed this title due to him drinking alcohol and eating pork, two “haram”, or forbidden elements in Islam), Jinnah claimed Pakistan as an “Islamic Republic”, a place where Muslims–who were serious minorities in India at the time–could become the majority by basking in a land of the religious free and by creating ideas and fostering innovations they never had the chance to do in British India because of the surrounding religious-fueled hatred that would suppress them. Although Jinnah’s motives seemed vague and innocent in nature, little did he know that his creation would remain to be one of the biggest political groundbreakers and blunders of modern Muslim history.

The blunders began its slow, slithering course after the Qaid-a-Azam died. His death left the Pakistani people with the title “Islamic Republic” hanging over their heads like a shrill fluorescent light bulb. So to maintain this title of “Islamic Republic”, Pakistan did not exactly enact Sharia law, but instead, tried to “grape pick” select concepts from the Quran to preserve Muslim culture and pride. One of them—which were brewing in the minds of British rulers and Indian Muslim politicians even before Pakistan was created—was the Blasphemy Law. The Blasphemy Law under the British prescribed punishments for intentionally destroying or defiling a place or an object of religion and trespassing on religious beliefs through oral, written and physical action. These Laws were inherited by Pakistan the day it was founded. Departing from a seemingly secular air into the murky waters of a religious zone. The law was morphed and proliferated by “Quranizaiton”. The pinnacle of this Quranizaiton was achieved after 1980, thanks to the notorious Zia-ul-Haq setting off the spark with his Islamizaiton policies. A slew of clauses were added to the chapter of religious offences in the Pakistan Penal Code. Clauses like the anti-Ahmadi laws, the anti-derogatory laws, the anti-Quran laws, the anti-Quran defamation laws, the prophet blasphemy laws and many others were piled on more and more to this measure that the law must be as long as a mini-constitution by now.

Now keep this radically mutated law in mind and drag in the current Shia killings into the picture. We can see that blasphemy is a clumsy finger and concept of shifting blame. And even worse, one can blasphemize their religion by using their own religion. That is the very problem of religious sectarianism: it tears the meaning of blasphemy asunder, leaving it as a disembodied shard of mosaic lying in each sect and these shard have nooks and crannies so inconvenient that never shall they puzzle back together with their lost counterpart. One can be a weapon and victim simultaneously.
Same can be applied in the Shia killings in Pakistan. Their religion is not the religion of Pakistan…

…or, whatever that means.

Right now there is nothing but a serenade of self-destruction in Pakistan, a composition of expressive love by the means of violence and hatred. Muslims kill Muslims. Commonly, religion is meant to be a collective unit of believers to create one, collective identity, a flock of sheep shepherding their way through life. And collectivism calls for interdependence. Interdependence is a rosary that says that you are my other me, my brother, my sister. Therefore, killing you would mean I am killing myself. Given this widely known idea, we can see what exactly the “Islamic Republic” of Pakistan is undergoing. Its people self destruct as they destruct others.

 

 

An article from the Catholic News Service submitted by Noor Salik

 News Items:
 Headlines
 News Briefs
 Stories
 Movies
 Word To Life
 More News:
 Vatican
 Africa
 Special Sections:
 2006 in review
 Inside the Curia
 Archives:
 Vatican II at 40
 John Paul II
 Other Items:
 Client Area
 Links
 Origins
.
 Did You Know…

The whole CNS
public Web site
headlines, briefs
stories, etc,
represents less
than one percent
of the daily news
report.

Get all the news!

If you would like
more information
about the
Catholic News
Service daily
news report,
please contact
CNS at one of
the following:
cns@
catholicnews.com
or
(202) 541-3250

.
 Copyright:

This material
may not
be published,
broadcast,
rewritten or
otherwise
distributed.

Copyright
(c) 2007
Catholic News
Service/U.S.
Conference of
Catholic Bishops.

 CNS Story:

VATICAN LETTER Mar-1-2002 (910 words) Backgrounder. With photo. xxxi

Longing for God: Mother Teresa’s letters reveal isolation, doubts

By Cindy Wooden
Catholic News Service

VATICAN CITY (CNS) — As Missionaries of Charity Father Brian Kolodiejchuk pores over the letters of Mother Teresa of Calcutta and the reports of her spiritual directors, he is increasingly struck by the enormous difficulty of all she accomplished.

The priest, who is in charge of preparing material for Mother Teresa’s beatification, is not surprised by the effort it took to open houses for the dying, the sick and the homeless.

The surprising aspect is how much she did despite feeling for years that God had abandoned her, he said.

Her letters to her spiritual directors over the years are filled with references to “interior darkness,” to feeling unloved by God and even to the temptation to doubt that God exists.

She wrote to her spiritual director in a 1959-60 spiritual diary, “In my soul, I feel just the terrible pain of loss, of God not wanting me, of God not being God, of God not really existing.”

In another letter she wrote that she wanted to love God “like he has not been loved,” and yet she felt her love was not reciprocated.

In the context of Mother Teresa’s life, the thoughts are not heresy, but signs of holiness, Father Kolodiejchuk said in a late-February interview.

Mother Teresa was convinced God existed and had a plan for her life, even if she did not feel his presence, the priest said.

“Everyone wants to share, to talk about things, to be encouraged by others,” he said, but Mother Teresa, “hurting on the inside, kept smiling, kept working, kept being joyful.”

In a 1961 letter to the Missionaries of Charity, she wrote, “Without suffering our work would just be social work. … All the desolation of poor people must be redeemed and we must share in it.”

Father Kolodiejchuk, a 45-year-old Canadian ordained in the Ukrainian-Byzantine rite, was among the first members of the Missionaries of Charity Fathers. Members of Mother Teresa’s order often heard her refer to Sept. 10, 1946, as “Inspiration Day,” when on a train in India she experienced a call to live and work with the poor.

Mother Teresa had described the call as “an order, a duty, an absolute certainty” that she must leave the Sisters of Loreto and move into the slums of Calcutta to devote herself completely to the poor.

“We thought that in some way, which she never explained, she experienced Jesus’ call,” Father Kolodiejchuk said.

But now, from reading her correspondence with her spiritual director, he said, it is clear she experienced what theologians call an “interior imaginative locution” — she distinctly heard a voice in her head tell her what to do.

“And it continued for some months,” he said.

“The call was so direct that she knew it was the right thing despite this darkness she experienced for many years, at least until the 1970s,” the priest said.

At one point, a former archbishop of Calcutta wanted to share some of her letters with a struggling founder of another religious congregation, Father Kolodiejchuk said.

Mother Teresa begged him not to and asked that all her letters be destroyed.

Father Kolodiejchuk said she told the archbishop, “When people know about the beginning, they will think more about me and less about Jesus.”

Does Father Kolodiejchuk worry that he is betraying her wishes by publicizing the information?

“I think her perspective is very different now,” Father Kolodiejchuk answered.

Several of the letters and diary entries were published last year in the “Journal of Theological Reflection” of the Jesuit-run Vidyajyoti School of Theology in New Delhi.

The investigations into her faith life are not idle prying, the priest said. Beatification and canonization are recognitions not of a person’s life work — which is obviously praiseworthy in Mother Teresa’s case — but of holiness.

While some people may be surprised or even shocked by Mother Teresa’s spiritual struggles, he said he hopes it also will help them come to “a fuller and deeper appreciation of holiness, which Mother Teresa lived in a way both simple and profound: she took what Jesus gave with a smile and stayed faithful even in the smallest things.”

The feeling that God is far away or even nonexistent is a common spiritual experience, he said.

“Maybe we won’t have the same intensity of experiences, but most of what she did was very ordinary — it just became extraordinary when it was all put together,” Father Kolodiejchuk said.

Mother Teresa died in Calcutta in September 1997.

In 1999, Pope John Paul II waived the rule requiring a five-year wait before a beatification process can begin.

Although he works on the cause from 8 a.m. to 7 p.m. daily, Father Kolodiejchuk said he believes it will be “several months” before the Vatican formally recognizes that Mother Teresa heroically lived the Christian virtues and declares her venerable.

He said work also is underway on preparing a report on the potential miracle needed for beatification: the 1998 cure of an Indian woman who had a huge, unidentified growth in her abdomen.

“People do say, ‘Do it faster,'” the priest said.

But the official process takes time, he said. “It is designed to discern the sense of the people of God and the verification of the miracle is God’s confirmation of that.”

‘The Blessings Of Atheism’ By Susan Jacoby

It is a worth reading article by Susan Jacoby, an atheist. She encourages atheists to show their positive, emotional and softer side. In the last few days, we heard atheism mostly based on negativism and vile attacks on religion.Viler the attacks, higher the slogans of Bravo and praise!

I think she should have condemned the extreme views of atheists like Dawkins and Hitchens. Unfortunately most of the views and tone of the language we heard in our Forum was closer to Dawkins. I have difference of opinion with author’s views, but I appreciate her demeanor and approach.( F. Sheikh)

Some excerpts;

“It is a positive blessing, not a negation of belief, to be free of what is known as the theodicy problem. Human “free will” is Western monotheism’s answer to the question of why God does not use his power to prevent the slaughter of innocents, and many people throughout history (some murdered as heretics) have not been able to let God off the hook in that fashion.

The atheist is free to concentrate on the fate of this world — whether that means visiting a friend in a hospital or advocating for tougher gun control laws — without trying to square things with an unseen overlord in the next. Atheists do not want to deny religious believers the comfort of their faith. We do want our fellow citizens to respect our deeply held conviction that the absence of an afterlife lends a greater, not a lesser, moral importance to our actions on earth.

Today’s atheists would do well to emulate some of the great 19th-century American freethinkers, who insisted that reason and emotion were not opposed but complementary.”

The author talks about Robert Ingersoll, the Great Agnostic of 19th century.

“He also frequently delivered secular eulogies at funerals and offered consolation that he clearly considered an important part of his mission. In 1882, at the graveside of a friend’s child, he declared: “They who stand with breaking hearts around this little grave, need have no fear. The larger and the nobler faith in all that is, and is to be, tells us that death, even at its worst, is only perfect rest … The dead do not suffer.”

“We must speak up as atheists in order to take responsibility for whatever it is humans are responsible for — including violence in our streets and schools. We need to demonstrate that atheism is rooted in empathy as well as intellect. And although atheism is not a religion, we need community-based outreach programs so that our activists will be as recognizable to their neighbors as the clergy.”

“Finally, we need to show up at gravesides, as Ingersoll did, to offer whatever consolation we can.”

To read full article click on link below;

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/06/opinion/sunday/the-blessings-of-atheism.html?pagewanted=1&ref=general&src=me

Posted by F. Sheikh

 

Why, God?

This touching article by Maureen Dowd of NYT. While reading the article, if you get teary eye, don’t hold them back.Here are some excerpts from the article, but better read the whole article by clicking at the link at bottom.

Maureen Dowd is beautifully narrating the thoughts of Father Kevin’O Neal

Father O’Neal tells a 30-year-old story;

“The killings on the cusp of Christmas in quiet, little East Coast towns stirred a 30-year-old memory from my first months as a priest in parish ministry in Boston. I was awakened during the night and called to Brigham and Women’s Hospital because a girl of 3 had died. The family was from Peru. My Spanish was passable at best. When I arrived, the little girl’s mother was holding her lifeless body and family members encircled her.

They looked to me as I entered. Truth be told, it was the last place I wanted to be. To parents who had just lost their child, I didn’t have any words, in English or Spanish, that wouldn’t seem cheap, empty. But I stayed. I prayed. I sat with them until after sunrise, sometimes in silence, sometimes speaking, to let them know that they were not alone in their suffering and grief. The question in their hearts then, as it is in so many hearts these days, is “Why?”

The truest answer is: I don’t know. I have theological training to help me to offer some way to account for the unexplainable. But the questions linger. I remember visiting a dear friend hours before her death and reminding her that death is not the end, that we believe in the Resurrection. I asked her, “Are you there yet?” She replied, “I go back and forth.” There was nothing I wanted more than to bring out a bag of proof and say, “See? You can be absolutely confident now.” But there is no absolute bag of proof. I just stayed with her. A life of faith is often lived “back and forth” by believers and those who minister to them.”

Father O’ Neal Continues;

“I believe differently now than 30 years ago. First, I do not expect to have all the answers, nor do I believe that people are really looking for them. Second, I don’t look for the hand of God to stop evil. I don’t expect comfort to come from afar. I really do believe that God enters the world through us. And even though I still have the “Why?” questions, they are not so much “Why, God?” questions. We are human and mortal. We will suffer and die. But how we are with one another in that suffering and dying makes all the difference as to whether God’s presence is felt or not and whether we are comforted or not.”

“One true thing is this: Faith is lived in family and community, and God is experienced in family and community. We need one another to be God’s presence. When my younger brother, Brian, died suddenly at 44 years old, I was asking “Why?” and I experienced family and friends as unconditional love in the flesh. They couldn’t explain why he died. Even if they could, it wouldn’t have brought him back. Yet the many ways that people reached out to me let me know that I was not alone. They really were the presence of God to me. They held me up to preach at Brian’s funeral. They consoled me as I tried to comfort others. Suffering isolates us. Loving presence brings us back, makes us belong.”

Father O’Neal Concludes:

I will never satisfactorily answer the question “Why?” because no matter what response I give, it will always fall short. What I do know is that an unconditionally loving presence soothes broken hearts, binds up wounds, and renews us in life. This is a gift that we can all give, particularly to the suffering. When this gift is given, God’s love is present and Christmas happens daily. 

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/26/opinion/dowd-why-god.html?src=me&ref=general

Posted by F. Sheikh