Struggle Between Reformists and Old Guards Within Muslim Brotherhood

A worth reading article in NYT. It is true about many Muslim organizations, including many Muslim organization in USA. Islamists are a significant part of every Muslim Society, and they can neither be silenced by force nor excluded from a dialogue to find the common ground. ( F. Sheikh)

“As Essam Sultan, who represented the Brotherhood in the Egyptian lawyers’ syndicate, recalled: “We thought we were the only ones qualified to manage the affairs of the country, and that other opinions and viewpoints were always mistaken. But our interactions with others changed our convictions.” Likewise, Abdel Moneim Aboul Fotouh, a doctor who became the Brotherhood’s leading progressive figure, explained that through engagement with the broader society, “we came to realize that the scope for agreement and cooperation was in fact quite broad.”

In Tunisia and Morocco, leaders with similar ideas ultimately rose to the top of Islamist parties and have shaped their direction ever since. But in Egypt, the reformists never gained more than a seat or two in the Brotherhood’s executive council, or Guidance Bureau. Instead, the Bureau remained the nearly exclusive preserve of a close-knit group of veterans whose prestige rested on their long history in the movement and their enormous sacrifices on its behalf. As they saw it, the young “upstarts” had no right to challenge their authority or demand a greater share of decision-making power.

Aboul-Ela Maadi, an Islamist active in the engineers’ syndicate in the early 1990s, explained that while he and other reformist leaders were busy holding conferences on democracy and human rights, the old guard was consolidating its control over the recruitment and socialization of new members. As Mr. Maadi ruefully observed, he and other reformist leaders failed to appreciate the importance of grass-roots outreach. Their own neglect of the Brotherhood’s base, Mr. Maadi explained, set the stage for the “great theft,” allowing the old guard to steal the loyalty of the younger generation from them.

Eventually, growing frustration with the old guard’s rigid ideas and autocratic management style prompted some of the Brotherhood’s most capable and dynamic leaders to leave the group and strike out on their own. The exodus of the reformists accelerated during the 2011 uprising against Mr. Mubarak and the political opening that followed it. Mr. Sultan, Mr. Aboul Fotouh, Mr. Maadi and other former Brotherhood members are now involved in new parties, and many Islamist youth who share their progressive outlook have left the Brotherhood to join them.”

“YET now, as a result of the army’s intervention, Mr. Morsi has suddenly been transformed from a tone-deaf and ineffectual leader to a hero of the Islamist cause. The Brotherhood is pitching itself as a victim of a conspiracy, rather than taking responsibility for its mistakes.

Some reformist figures inside and outside the Brotherhood who were openly critical of Mr. Morsi’s policies when he was in office have rallied to his side and joined in denouncing the military-imposed interim government. And those most inclined to acknowledge — and learn from — the Brotherhood’s missteps are unlikely to gain traction as long as the military seems bent on the Brotherhood’s destruction.

Had reformists in the Muslim Brotherhood gained the upper hand in 2011, Egypt’s transition might have taken a very different turn. The Brotherhood may not have run a candidate of its own for president, or if it had, it might have selected someone more disposed to compromise and consensus building than Mr. Morsi. Such a president would most likely have worked to strengthen ties with the secular opposition, rather than made the controversial moves that eroded its trust and good will.” Click link for article;

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/28/opinion/sunday/egypts-missed-opportunity.html?hp

Posted By F. Sheikh

Egypt’s Coup & Behind The Scene Plans

The Grand Scam: Spinning Egypt’s Military Coup

by ESAM AL-AMIN

“On April 22, 2011, UAE Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Zayed brought his intelligence and security chiefs to meet with King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia and his security officials to discuss the ramifications of the Arab Spring. Bin Zayed warned that unless the GCC countries developed a proactive policy to preempt the wave of popular uprisings sweeping the Arab World at the time, none of the region’s monarchs would survive. Three weeks later in an emergency summit meeting in Riyadh he delivered the same message to all the GCC heads of state. While Qatar remained indifferent to his message, the other five countries were receptive. Bin Zayed and Prince Bandar Bin Sultan, the Saudi intelligence chief, were tasked with submitting an effective plan to counter the Arab Spring phenomenon in the region. Subsequently, King Abdullah solicited and received the help of King Abdullah II of Jordan to join this effort while Qatar was excluded from all future meetings.

For decades, the UAE had been very close to Mubarak and his cronies. Billions of dollars of ill-gotten fortunes looted from the country were deposited in banks in Abu Dhabi and Dubai. After the overthrow of Mubarak, dozens of security officials and corrupt businessmen quietly left Egypt and relocated to the UAE. When Mubarak’s last Prime Minister, Ahmad Shafiq lost the presidential elections to Morsi in June 2012, he also moved to the UAE. By the fall of 2012, it became evident that the UAE hosted a web of individuals who were plotting the overthrow of Morsi and the MB.”

“In November 2012, Prince Bandar presented two detailed plans to the Americans through the CIA. Plan A was a quick plot to topple Morsi in early December while Plan B was a long term plan that involved two tracks. One track was a series of destabilizing protests that would culminate in Morsi’s ouster, while another track included uniting the opposition to form one coalition to defeat the MB at the polls if the first track failed. While the CIA was fully aware of the plan it neither endorsed nor objected to it because the Obama administration, playing both sides, was also pursuing dialogue with the Morsi government.

The plan to topple the MB was built around a plot to assassinate Morsi in his residence on December 5. However, it was exposed by a loyal mid-level presidential guard hours before it was to take place. With the help of the MB, Morsi was able to thwart the plot, though he declined to expose it or discuss it publicly.”

“In March 2013, NSF leader ElBaradei met with Shafiq and Bin Zayed in the UAE. They all agreed that the only way to dislodge Morsi and the MB from power was by undermining his rule and the stability of the country internally and convincing Western governments, particularly the U.S., the U.K., France, and Germany, to back a military takeover. According to a recent WSJ report, a series of meetings took place in the Naval Officers Club between senior military officers, fulool representatives including the attorney of billionaire and Mubarak crony, Ahmed Ezz, the architect of the 2010 fraudulent parliamentary elections, and opposition leaders including ElBaradei. According to this report, which was not refuted or denied by any side, the army generals told the opposition that they would not move to oust Morsi unless millions of people take to the streets on their side.”

http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/07/19/the-grand-scam-spinning-egypts-military-coup

Posted By F. Sheikh

 

‘IN DEFENSE OF PROFILING’ By Shoeb Amin

All of us have heard enough of that word over the last 2-3 weeks in reference to the Trayvon Martin case. Did George Zimmerman profile Trayvon Martin? I strongly believe he did. Did he profile him because he was African-American and that he was wearing a hoodie? Again I strongly believe he did. Were there other factors in Zimmerman’s targeting Martin? May be his previous experience with young African Americans in his neighborhood? But was Zimmerman practically wrong so far? Ethically or morally we may say he was wrong but was he practically wrong so far?  What he did after this stage was, in my view, wrong. He followed Martin even after being told not to. Very likely he felt emboldened by the fact he had a gun on him and may be even with the knowledge that state laws would protect him if he had to use his gun. So he followed Martin and challenged him in spite of having a size disadvantage. And I think it was his post-profiling actions of Zimmerman that caused this terrible tragedy.
But coming back to the main question. Was Zimmerman practically (the operative word) wrong in profiling Martin? Is it really unfair for non-Blacks to click their car doors locked? To cringe when you encounter a Black teenager on a somewhat deserted road? Even though it is politically incorrect to say it, my answer is no. My feeling is that some Blacks themselves profile some Black teenagers. You’d say but I am not Black and I don’t understand the hurt that profiling causes and what right do I have to say that such profiling is justified? I am a dark-skinned Muslim and I have some moral grounds to say that.  I feel I have been profiled – not for criminal activity – but as a less important person, not deserving of the same prompt, courteous service that other clients got. So I know how hurtful that is. In the last few years Muslims, especially from certain countries, were profiled at airports. Was that wrong? Again ethically may be wrong but practically my answer would be “no”. There were enough incidents of Muslims from certain countries causing significant havoc to arouse that suspicion of anybody that fit that description.
Coming back to Black teenagers, even the President, in his speech 2-3 days ago, said, and I am paraphrasing “the African American community is not naive to know that black teenagers commit a disproportionate amount of crime, and Trayvon was more likely to have been killed by another Black teenager than by a Zimmerman”. Just Google the crime statistics of Black teenagers; different sites have their own spin to what those statistics mean but I have chosen one where there could be no question of racial bias. http://www.finalcall.com/artman/publish/article_5567.shtml. Having that knowledge in the back of your mind what should one do when you encounter a black teenager on a deserted road? Walk away; cross the street or say to yourself “I know he is a Black teenager but he likely comes from a dysfunctional family, he is poor, he was himself subject to violence and there is the history of slavery in this country; and in consideration of those factors, one should not profile this teenager and act the same way as if you had encountered Mark Zuckerman wearing a hoodie (a common comparison used these days). I think I would certainly cringe in that situation and even cross the street. A lot of very nice folks would do the same too. It is regrettable but it is a survival instinct.
So we are asked to have a dialogue about race between the races. I think the dialogue should be among Black leaders in particular and may be the rest of us as to how to improve the reputation of Black teenagers. The answers lie in improving the state of dysfunctional families; decreasing the incidence of deadbeat fathers and single/unwed mothers; decreasing the number of fatherless children; and improving poverty, education and violence in the community.

Immigration: Assimilation and the measure of an American; Submitted by Nasik Elahi

Immigration reform, making its way through Congress, and the Boston Marathon bombings – allegedly committed by two Chechen immigrants – has raised heated debate about how we measure the assimilation of newcomers civically, culturally, economically, and even patriotically.

For the rest of this interesting article click on the link below.

http://m.csmonitor.com/USA/Society/2013/0707/Immigration-Assimilation-and-the-measure-of-an-American/(page)/3