Socrates- What Kind Of Citizen Was He ?(Should One Obey The System Even If It Is Corrupt? )

Interesting article by Josiah Ober on Socrates and what his death meant for a civic citizen.(f,sheikh) Conventional wisdom sees Socrates as a martyr for free speech, but he accepted his death sentence for a different cause.  

Some 2,400 years ago, in 399 BCE, Athens put Socrates on trial. The charge was impiety, and the trial took place in the People’s Court. Socrates, already 70 years old, had long been a prominent philosopher and a notorious public intellectual. Meletus, the prosecutor, alleged that Socrates had broken Athenian law by failing to observe the state gods, by introducing new gods, and by corrupting the youth.

Meletus, as prosecutor, and Socrates, as defendant, delivered timed speeches before a jury of 501 of their fellow citizens. Meletus’ prosecution speech is lost. Two versions of Socrates’ defence speech, one recorded by Plato and the other by a clever polymath named Xenophon, are preserved. A majority of jurors (about 280) voted Socrates guilty, and he was executed by hemlock poisoning.

There is no dispute about the basic facts of the trial of Socrates. It is less obvious why Athenians found Socrates guilty, and what it might mean today. People who believe in both democracy and the rule of law ought to be very interested in this trial. If the takeaway is either that democracy, as direct self-government by the people, is fatally prone to repress dissent, or that those who dissent against democracy must be regarded as oligarchic traitors, then we are left with a grim choice between democracy and intellectual freedom.

But that is the wrong way to view Socrates’ trial. Rather, the question it answers concerns civic obligation and commitment. The People’s Court convicted Socrates because he refused to accept that a norm of personal responsibility for the effects of public speech applied to his philosophical project. Socrates accepted the guilty verdict as binding, and drank thehemlock, because he acknowledged the authority of the court and the laws under which he was tried. And he did so even though he believed that the jury had made a fundamental mistake in interpreting the law.Click for full article.

https://aeon.co/essays/the-civic-drama-of-socrates-trial?utm_source=Aeon+Newsletter&utm_campaign=efc57348d4-Daily_Newsletter_20_September_20169_20_2016&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_411a82e59d-efc57348d4-69109725

The Left in Pakistan-3-1971 Debacle

 Author: Syed Ehtisham     

      Indra moves to Dacca, Bhutto  in West-Wali Khan offers to negotiate to Keep Pak one, Bhutto lets Mujib leave in a hurry.

The Indian Prime Minister Indra Gandhi was the daughter of the first Prime Minister of India. Pundit Nehru. The latter was an idealist and one of the founding fathers of Independent India. Undivided India was an article of faith for him and others leaders of independence movement.

Indra Gandhi skillfully presented India’s case, dwelling rather more on human misery of unprecedented scale than on the crushing economic burden of having to look after millions of refugees.

Pakistan, ruled by an unelected, brutal and dissolute General, sent a foreign office bureaucrat who had difficulty getting an appointment with mid-level officials.

On return from a highly successful tour, Indra renewed her ultimatum to Pakistan.

Admiral Ahsan, the Governor dealt with civilian administration. Ahsan renewed his offer to mediate. He could work out an arrangement under which Pakistan Army could get out intact, with out being humiliated. Pakistan would become a con-federation. It would keep the country in one piece. The international community supported the plan. India fell in line, though reluctantly. They would lose the opportunity to undo Pakistan.

The military cabal vetoed the proposal.  Bhutto endorsed the veto.

Pakistani generals, in total denial of reality[xxxi], deluded themselves into thinking that by initiating a conflict on the western border they would get international intervention-cease fire etc. Bhutto had lavished compliments on them for coming up with this brilliant idea.

Indian Government gave a final ultimatum to Pakistan to withdraw her forces from East Bengal voluntarily and immediately. The ultimatum was rejected by Pakistan.

Indian army went into action on its border with East Pakistan. Pakistani army with drew, after a token resistance to “defensible” strong points. But they destroyed all infra structure, crops, boats, cars, buses, bridges, public buildings, industrial plants, schools and hospitals. It was a campaign of wanton and malicious vengeance. The butcher had already run away, leaving a hapless General Niazi to hold the crumbling fort (It is hardly credible but according Akbar S. Ahmad, a senior Pakistani civil servant at the time, when he visited the military HQ in Dacca, he was told of a Niazi plan. He did not what it was and said. Niazi frowned at him as one would to a very poorly informed person. He was told by an aide that the plan was to win a corridor from Dacca through India to Lahore).

At this point Yahya decided to open hostilities on the Western border. Pakistan air force planes bombed some Indian airports. They actually went as far as Agra right in the belly of India. The hoped and preyed for international intervention did not materialize.

Lahore was with in easy grasp of India. All their army had to do was to walk in. Nixon-Kissinger warned India off West Pakistan. Nixon announced that he had ordered the USA pacific fleet to move towards East Pakistan. It was a shot across Indra’s sails. It worked or as some would have it she had other ideas[xxxii].. Only the Chinese government, in an eerie replay of a similar claim during 1965 India Pakistan war, accused the Indian border forces of abducting a few cows and goats. They could not do any more. India, as on the previous occasion, hastily offered immediate restitution.

Pakistan army’s resistance crumbled in the East and the West. On the eastern side they would soon abandon even the pretence of putting up a fight. Many senior officers fled in helicopters pushing women and children off the planes*. (US forces were to emulate Pakistanis in their flight from Vietnam, except that American service men pushed Vietnamese and not their own country women and children off the steps of the plane). But the day before surrender, they rounded up and shot in cold blood, all the educated people they could lay their hands on in Dhaka[xxxiii].

Mukti Bahini guerillas would have torn all 90,000 Pakistani military and civilian personnel and family members to shreds. But the Indian army expeditiously threw a protective cordon around them and hastily moved them to POW camps in India.

Parvez Hoodbhoy-Zia’s generation is everywhere today in Pakistan. A moderate Muslim majority country has become one where the majority of citizens want Islam to play a key role in politics. The effects of indoctrination are clearly visible. Even as the sharia-seeking Taliban were busy blowing up girls and boys schools (over 950, to date), a survey by World Public Opinion.Org in 2008 found that 54% of Pakistanis wanted strict application of sharia while 25% wanted it in some more dilute form. Totaling 79%, this was the largest percentage in the four countries surveyed (Morocco, Egypt, Pakistan, Indonesia).

Bhutto had taken over a country universally despised for the genocide in East Pakistan. He faced immense problems. India had captured large swathes of territory in the west too. 90,000 of his countrymen, soldiers, their kin and civil servants with their families were in India. The government of BD was demanding the surrender of the butcher of Bengal, now the army chief of Pakistan, plus scores of army men from among the POWs.. If push came to shove Pakistan would have had to give up the butcher.

All Bhutto had in hand was Mujib in a Pakistani jail. He was certainly not in a position to touch the President of BD. Had he done so, Indra’s hand would have been forced. She would have had to attack West Pakistan, free Mujib and try Bhutto as a war criminal. Why Indra did not let the BD government conduct war crimes trials is a mystery. Hitler’s entourage were hanged and awarded long jail terms for lesser crimes.

I visited Karachi, Lahore and Rawalpindi a few months after the Pakistan army had surrendered in Dhaka. A state of total gloom pervaded the atmosphere. Even the elite were on the edge. They were still in complete denial.  Bhutto in their eyes was the savior.

I embarked on a twenty-four hour-long journey from Karachi to Lahore on a railway train. I have seen more cheerful funeral processions.

I was in Lahore on the day Bhutto addressed a public meeting as the president and chief martial law administrator[xxxiv] of Pakistan. He had carted the whole diplomatic corps from Islamabad for the occasion and had ridden a carriage pulled by eight white horses, relic of the raj, slowly through the streets of Lahore to the meeting ground. People did line the streets of the route. But they were not up to the effort to greet him with full-throated “Zindabad”, long live slogans.

Bhutto had one incontestable talent. He could put up a show. His detractors had called him a “Madari”; a juggler. He made a vehement speech interspersed with his antics. The only time the crowd responded lustily was when he swore an obscenity.

I next visited Rawalpindi, the seat of army GHQ.  This city was teeming with relatives and friends of POW’s held in India. Few received any news through Red Cross and other such agencies. They openly castigated the senior army officers who had run away leaving their juniors to face the bloodthirsty Bengali freedom fighters.

The news that I was visiting from the UK spread soon and my host was swamped by requests to see me. They gave me letters to mail from London and requested me to call the Red Cross, UNO and embassies in London. They were clutching at straws.

Army had appointed Bhutto as the foreign minister, and sent him to NY to defend Pakistan’s case in the UN Security council. His grandstanding did not do any good to any one except himself. He was playing to the domestic audience; he tore up the draft resolution demanding immediate cease-fire.

Before returning to Pakistan he quietly called on Nixon and his staff and the secretary of state and presumably obtained their clearance and blessings to supplant the army high command. Nothing would quite explain the arrogance with which he demanded and the ease with which the army high command complied with his demands. He was handed over total control of the Government. He styled himself Chief Martial Administer cum President of the country.  He had driven into the President house in a plain car and driven out in a vehicle bedecked with national, presidential and CMLA flags.

Indra had apparently decided to solve the Pakistan “problem” once and for all. She had held her hand when told that China would defend West Pakistan if attacked and the USA would not rush to her assistance as it did in 1961 when Chinese troops had walked across the border.

Indra had neutralized the threat of all out Chinese intervention by the disinterred and freshly signed thirty years treaty of friendship with the Soviet Union. Soviets had wanted it and draft had been ready since 1969, but Indians had demurred. China could not take on Russia.

Nixon and Kissinger could not countenance complete annihilation of Pakistan. India would become too powerful. They needed a counter poise and exerted tremendous pressure on Indra to keep her from over running West Pakistan too.  But why would she listen to them? She could have neutralized any overt threat from them by the simple expedient of offering Russians access to a warm water seaport.

Bhutto had taken over a country universally despised for the genocide in East Pakistan. Its people were groaning under the twin burdens of low esteem and terrible guilt complex. India had captured large swathes of territory in the west too. 90,000 of his countrymen, soldiers, their kin and civil servants with their families were in India. The government of BD was demanding the surrender of the butcher of Bengal, now the army chief of Pakistan, plus scores of army men from among the POWs.

Indra had not shown her hand. No body knew if she would have any qualms in sending the men to BD for the trials. If push came to shove Pakistan would have had to give up the butcher.

All Bhutto had in hand was Mujib in a Pakistani jail. He was certainly not in a position to touch the President of BD. Had he done so; Indra’s hand would have been forced. She would have had to attack West Pakistan, free Mujib and try Bhutto as a war criminal.

Why Indra did not let the BD government conduct war crimes trials is a mystery. Hitler’s entourage were hanged and awarded long jail terms for lesser crimes. Astute observers speculated that she did not want Pakistan army cleaned of bad blood. If she had deliberately planned to under mine the country she went about it in no uncertain manner.

On my return to England, I found Pakistanis in the depth of despair here too. Some religious, older East Pakistanis joined in grieving over a lost dream. Even the jingoist immigrants from the martial race were subdued.

Once he had all the levers of power securely in his hands, Bhutto negotiated skillfully for release of the POWs, and return of the Pakistan territory, India had captured.       Indra received him graciously, as befitted a magnanimous victor. The only concession he made was to agree that Kashmir dispute was a bilateral issue between India and Pakistan, and not an International issue as had been hitherto accepted by the world bodies. International intervention had failed to produce any solution any way.

Indra did not humiliate him to the extent that he would lose all credibility in residual Pakistan. He could be replaced by a bunch of raving fanatics. She wanted a stable though weak state at her border. India was obliged to feed 90,000 POWs and keeping them secure. It was not an inconsiderable consideration. But when all is said and done, Indra behaved like a statesman, stateswoman if you will.

Mujib was still in a prison in West Pakistan. Bhutto grandiloquently declared that if Mujeeb agreed to a reunified Pakistan, he would order the latter’s release from the jail and hand over reins of power to him as the Prime Minister of All Pakistan. Wali Khan, a veteran politician, scion of the famous Khan family of NWFP, offered to visit Mujeeb in jail and convince him to take over from Bhutto. I am paraphrasing an article by Wali Khan that I read in a Pakistani magazine that Bhutto thanked the Khan for the offer, but the next thing he heard was that Mujib was put on a special and secret PIA flight early one morning to London!! Wali Khan claimed that Bhutto was so scared that Mujib would accept the offer, and displace him that he lost no time in sending the man away

The Left in Pakistan-4-Mujib to BD, Bhutto Rules a Fiefdom

Mujib was lodged in a suite of rooms at the Claridge Hotel assigned to heads of state. The suite was immediately swamped by well-wishers, inundated by phone calls from BD, Indra Gandhi and the British PM Edward Heath, among scores of other callers. Mujib’s suite soon became the nerve center of BD government. He wanted to rest for a few days after nine months of solitary confinement.

Anthony Mascarenhas in his book “Bangla Desh, A Legacy of Blood” claims that Mujib had made a deal with Bhutto to maintain some kind of link with Pakistan. His comrades in arms were not prepared to countenance any linkage with the erstwhile parent country.

Mujib had been kept in a cell with out any radio, TV or newspapers, and was not even allowed to talk to his jailers. He was unaware of the genocide perpetrated by the Pakistan army. The truth would not sink in till he reached Dhaka. He had to forego the little time off he needed for recuperation. A virtual insurgency had developed among the different factions in the government being run in his name in BD.

After the surrender of the Pakistan army to the Indian forces, Mujib’s assistants returned in triumph to, the Independent state of Bangla Desh, and installed themselves as the provisional government of the republic. A definitive establishment would have to await Mujib’s return.  They behaved as all revolutionary governments do; sought revenge, put opponents in jail, conducted kangaroo court trials, appropriated property, businesses, and even houses of their opponents. Urdu speaking people became the special targets.

The situation was saved from degenerating into mass starvation, rampant epidemics, and enormous loss of life by the unprecedented scale of international help, and by the logistic support provided by the Indian army.

About half a million Urdu speaking persons had been left stranded. They were herded, for security, into hastily erected refugee camps. They were legally Pakistani citizens, and did not want to relinquish the citizenship. BD did not want them, though at one point an offer to grant citizenship to those born in Bengal was made. It was not taken up. Pakistan did not want to accept them either. They became stateless- South Asian equivalent of Palestinian refugees. They did not even have the consolation of being able to put the blame on “the infidel”. Their fellow Muslims-Pakistanis and Bangla Deshis had turned away from them.

Pakistan had to accept their claim of citizenship, but pleaded lack of resources for their repatriation and resettlement. Saudi and other gulf Governments set up a trust fund for the purpose.

The province of Punjab offered to take them all if housing, jobs and means of sustenance could be provided for them. Finances were not a problem.  Muslim potentate’s largesse had seen to that.

But Sindhis were apprehensive that regardless of where these Urdu speakers were initially resettled, they would eventually gravitate to its cities. With the addition of the “Biharis”, as the Pakistanis left behind came to be called, the balance of population too would be tilted to against them. They started talking of being “Red Indianized”.

A few thousand houses were, nevertheless, built in the Punjab, and those with close relations in Pakistan were repatriated. Some made their way to Pakistan by bribing the border guards. The rest, over one hundred thousand in number (2006), clinging to the fiction of Pakistani Citizenship, are still languishing in UNO refugee camps. There is poor sanitation, little education, and deplorable lack of any purposeful activity in the Camps. A few have taken to doing jobs illegally.

The whole atmosphere is that of sloth, hopelessness, despair, and dejection. Moral turpitude is prevalent. “Sex” work is common.

Trust funds for their rehabilitation have, in the meanwhile, grown enormously. In 2004, they amounted to over 500 million US Dollars. In 2004, some camp residents, born since independence of BD (1971) moved the courts in the country that they should be entitled, under international law, to citizenship of the country. The courts agreed with the request and directed the BD Government to offer them citizenship. Some well meaning Pakistanis are (2006) planning a Quixotic appeal to the Supreme Court of Pakistan to order the Government of the country to accept the “stranded” Pakistanis.

The repatriates from the then East Pakistan, did gravitate to Karachi, and live in a vast sprawling make shift colony on the out skirts of the city. They have little by way of civic amenities. They are, however, an enterprising community and have established a large number of cottage industries making garments, weaving cloth, metal works, you name it. They were trained in sabotage, bomb making, espionage and other such activities by the Pakistan armed forces to fight the BD insurgents. They put the training to good use in periodic confrontations with the police, army and other security agencies. They also played a large role in ethnic riots promoted by Zia, which were to break out in Karachi during his dictatorship. They also proved a great source of strength to the ethnic Mohajir party that Zia is believed to have sponsored.  The matter would be discussed in detail later in the narrative. Suffice it to say at this point, that they contributed to the use of firearms in political affairs.

A large number of ethnic Bengalis were to migrate illegally to Pakistan. They live in Karachi and other urban centers in Sindh and do menial work. They are exploited by employers, victimized by security agencies and looked down upon by other ethnic elements. Many when compared to the average Bengalis are tall and fair. They are believed to be the products of the “Genetic Modification” practiced under the aegis of the butcher of Bengal.

The population of the country is, though, now less than that of Pakistan. The greater population of Bengal had always been a bone of contention. BD government was remarkably successful in promoting family planning. Frequent cyclones, hurricanes, floods, epidemics and poor living condition also worked the attrition. But it was too late to keep the old country in one piece.

One private venture the Grameen Bank lends small amounts of money to finance small home based industries like garment making etc. But that is a drop in the ocean.

In Pakistan, Bhutto took full advantage of the humiliation of the armed forces. He retired many in the top brass, and exiled others to comfortable sinecures as ambassadors.

He changed the designation of service Chiefs from that of Commander in Chief (C-in-C), which he called a relic of the colonial past, to that of Chief of the staff (COS). A new post, Chief of Joint Staff was created, but its occupant had only an advisory capacity.

On the civilian front, Bhutto tried to break the back of the entrenched bureaucracy.. He had lists of undesirable functionaries prepared. The criteria for inclusion in the list varied from the highest offence of ever disobeying the man himself to crossing the path of the lowliest PPP partisan. Corruption and inefficiency were prominent in being absent from the list.

Bhutto changed colonial designations of first to fourth class government servants to grades from 1 to 22.   Special cadres, like administration, police and customs, were organized. Previously a Superior services officer could be a magistrate, judge, a district collector, secretary of a department or serve in the Foreign Service. Now the successful entrants had to stay in their field. He also let professionals be promoted to senior most ranks. A Doctor could, for example become Secretary of Health ministry, an engineer secretary of communications and so on.

Under the pretext of attracting talent, he appointed favorites directly, with out the benefit of any experience, to senior bureaucratic positions. This procedure was called lateral entry.

There is little doubt the civil was rigid hierarchy.  Code of behavior was etched in stone. Above all, they were nearly complete segregated from ordinary mortals. A new patriotic institution needed to be created. But Bhutto went after the form much more than the substance. By introducing a few sycophants into the higher reaches of the service, he could not possibly change the “ruling class” mentality.

On the political front Bhutto offered a liberal democratic constitution. He even conceded the demands of the opposition that if he wanted executive powers; he should step down from the office of the President.

A constitutional draft was presented to the parliament. After careful deliberations, the ruling group accepted most of the amendments presented by the opposition. The document was passed by a unanimous vote in 1973. After the President had signed the document, martial law was lifted

In a malicious and Machiavellian display of bad faith, soon after the constitution had been passed, he declared a state of emergency, suspended civil rights, curtailed the authority of courts to entertain cases against the Government, and for all practical purposes set aside constitutional law. The opposition cried foul, but they were helpless

Bhutto ran the country as a fiefdom. It is widely believed that the head of a leading religious party, a venerable old man, was sexually assaulted while in jail. Bhutto personally threatened a high court judge with dire consequences, and pointedly referred to his daughter who went to college every day.

He was to haunt Bhutto later as a member of the panel of judges, which tried him for allegedly ordering murder of a political opponent.

His first law minister Mahmood Qusuri, author of the 1973 constitution, appeared to grow too big for his britches. He was sacked with the usual admonition to take care lest things were to happen to the females of the family.

Bhutto was one of the prime initiators of the “disappeared technique” of public policy. It was later to be practiced on a wide scale in Chile, and other South American countries. Hundreds were discovered in concentration camps in the early Zia period.             Another close associate, a noted student leader Mairaj Khan, who had been helpful in catapulting Bhutto into limelight after Ayub had sacked the latter, and had cajoled the left/progressives into casting their lot with the man, fell out with the boss.  To assert his newfound independent status, he joined a trade union procession. He was mercilessly beaten up by the police. He set something of a record.  I have not been able to find a precedent, in non-communist countries, when a sitting minister had been man handled by the police. (In later years, the mayor of Karachi was punched in the face by a police officer.  I have the pictures of his bleeding face of the dignitary on file). Mustafa Khar latter, after ruling the roost as governor of the Punjab, was in his turn, taken from his house, and left stranded in a remote area, with no roads and little traffic.  He had to walk about twenty miles before he could find a bullock cart driver to give him a lift to a town.

Bhutto had given catchy slogans of: Roti, Kapra aur Makan” roughly bread, clothes and house for all. He also declared that factories and mills belonged to workers. On his ascension to power the workers in many factories had taken him at his word.  They took over the work place in many industries, and in many instances locked the owners and administrators in their offices as punishment. Instances of verbal abuse hurled at the erstwhile masters were not uncommon. In a few cases the bosses were kept with out food or water for extended periods of time. This was termed “Gherao”, encirclement. Police dare not intervene, as the outrage was supposed to have the big chief’s sanction.  Instances of actual physical assault of the persons of the bosses were rare though.

Bhutto maintained a lavish court. Drunken orgies, wife swapping, and seduction of the wives of associates were reported to be common.

Bhutto had appointed Zia chief of the army after the Butcher of Bengal retired. He had given the man the top job over the heads of several generals senior to him. Zia was widely regarded as a mediocrity. He used to follow Bhutto like a loyal henchman, usually with a tray of whisky in his hands. He was to change colors later and launch a pseudo-theocratic state.

Perhaps the greatest disservice he did to the country was to rekindle the animosity between the older inhabitants of Sind and the newer ones who had migrated from India. The immigrants controlled most of the business and industry, education and professions.     The print media, dependent on Government advertisements for their daily bread, never virile in Pakistan, was reduced to abject servility. Radio and TV were under Government control already. One could easily dub the media, Bhutto voice.

He used state machinery to lavish favors on people who had done him a good turn in the days of his adversity. I have personal knowledge of one such examples.

In 1989 one of my class mates from Quetta College came to visit me in Karachi, and asked me, with an air of a person who had great and extra ordinary news to impart, if I remembered so and so from Quetta. I did. He then asked me if I had any idea what the man did now. I did not. The man, my friend blurted out, was a Judge of the Punjab High Court.  It was my turn to be astounded at the news. After passing the 12th grade examination with low grades, he had gone to Lahore where he managed to get an undergraduate degree and a degree in Law with similar ranking.

He took to frequenting the meetings Bhutto addressed, and made speeches in the latter’s favor in Bar association. Bhutto on ascension to power had appointed him to a lower court, from which perch he had, over the course of time, ascended the departmental ladder. He eventually rose to a seat in the Supreme Court!

Bhutto was bright and educated enough to understand that the feudal system and Capitalism were contradiction in terms.

Bhutto had given populist socialist slogans before assuming power. Workers had shown him the way by taking over industries. He nationalized- read expropriated- industries, banks, schools, commercial concerns, even cottage industries like flour mills. Capitalists fled the country. Most had stashed a good portion of their wealth in Foreign Banks and had large investments in real estate in London, NY and other major cities.

Banking was one of the more efficient and robust sections of commerce in Pakistan.  They offered good service, employed efficient persons, even some talented ones in the upper echelons, and were profitable enterprises. They had flourishing business in the UK and the USA and catered to the needs of expatriates who preferred to deal with them rather the native Banks. After nationalization, hundreds of millions in loans, with out any collateral, were given to sycophants, relatives and hangers on of the ruling clique.

Private schools, a relic of the colonial past, run by Churches, and a few other parochial groups provided high standard education for the progeny of the elite. They also accepted a few talented students from the middle and poorer classes.   Minority communities such as Parsis (Zoroastrians)[xxxv] managed a few schools as well.  The Government took them over. They started, like the government schools, churning out semi literate unemployable degree holders. Church and a few other high-powered schools managed to retrieve control, but many other less well connected they were reduced to low standards.

Bhutto convened a meeting of the heads of all Muslim countries in Lahore. He used the cover of the moot to obtain a “consensus from the conference to recognize BD”, publicly embraced Mujib, and buried the fictional existence of “United” Pakistan.

Bhutto was an expert at grandstanding. India had exploded a “peaceful” nuclear device in 1974. Bhutto had pledged a thousand years war with India.

The successful conference of the Muslim countries gave Bhutto a great boost.

             Bhutto fell victim to a delusion common to all tin pot dictators; he started taking his own bombast seriously and made a critical mistake.1

He called a conference of all the nuclear physicists of the country and demanded that they produce a workable nuclear device in the next four to five years. The nuclear scientists in Pakistan were, one and all, jaded bureaucrats living a comfortable life in cushy sinecures.

The group of scientists humbly expressed their inability to deliver the goods, proffering the valid excuse of lack of equipment, infra structure, technical staff, laboratories and supplies. He heaped obscene abuses on them and literally shouted them out of the Shamiana. Tail between legs, they slinked out.

.               A Pakistani metallurgist, A.Qadeer Khan, was worked in the translation department in a nuclear reprocessing plant in Holland. Married to a Dutch lady, he was trusted by his employers. That gave him unlimited access to all the records. He wrote to Bhutto that if he was given a personal audience, he could suggest a method of achieving the goal dearest to all their heart. Bhutto sent word to the man to present himself forthwith.

Qadeer brought photocopies of the relevant documents and a complete list of supplies, equipment, and materiel.  Bhutto ensconced him in a secure location, ordered that phony companies be set up to smuggle supplies in, and the man be given the highest priority in all he needed.  Khan turned out to be true to his word. He produced the bomb in about five years though due to the fear of international opprobrium the device could not be tested.

USA has always been obsessed with proliferation and of the exclusivity of the nuclear club[xxxvi]. Kissinger saw red in Bhutto’s plans to develop an atomic bomb and flew to Pakistan to upbraid the latter. Bhutto blandly denied the whole affair. Kissinger, as arrogant as they come, was incensed. He told Bhutto that the latter was insulting his intelligence, and that unless he ceased and desisted “we would make a horrible example of you”[xxxvii].  The confrontation with Kissinger sealed his fate

Subject: Bangladeshis can be as mean as Pakistanis.

Shared by Waqar Azeem
Here’s a mean and demonic maneuver of political opponents of Sheikha Haseena to serve a body- blow to the image of her illustrious father and her politics in Bangladesh. Similarly slanderous rumors (so what, even if a fact) were floated in Pakistan about Sk. Mujib’s nemesis ZAB.
Quote

This was an open letter addressed to Khaleda, More than 200000 Copy were distributed among the Public in the major towns of Bangladesh

SHEIKH MUJIBUR RAHMAN’S BIRTH HISTORY

Honorable Prime Minister
Of late, the Minister for Education has instructed that in the new text books of schools Sheikh Mujibur Rahman’s life history must be written. As it is an accepted universal fact that none can write history at his will or whims. History always evolves in the natural course of time and space. Therefore, Madam Prime Minister, appreciating this directive we the people of Bangladesh would humbly appeal with a caution to the Minister that a true and factual history of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman should be incorporated in the text books as the nation deserves to know how we were gifted with a leader of his stature who is being proclaimed as the ‘Father of the Nation’.
To help the Minister in his discourse, I would like to put forward some relevant facts acquired from the preserved documents in the archive of the Indian government not known to many of our countrymen.
In those preserved documents, some relevant information is recorded about the birth history of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman and his child hood.
In early nineteen twenties, one Mr. Chandi Das was a practicing lawyer in the Civil Court at Kolkata. He had a young beautiful daughter named Gouribala Das. One Mr. Aronnyo Kumar Chakravarti was working as a junior assistant to Mr. Chandi Das. Mr. Chakravarti had a free access to Mr. Das’s residence at his will and used to visit the family frequently. In the process he developed intimate personal illicit relationship with Gouribala. Consequentially, Gouribala became pregnant. When pregnancy was confirmed Gouribala and her father started pressing hard on Mr. Chakravarti to get married. But Mr. Chakravarti being a high cast Brahmin was not only outraged and flatly denied his illicit relationship but audaciously refused to marry Gouribala who belonged to a lower cast. He also disowned the claim that the child was sired by him. Such behavior from Mr. Chakravarti came as a rude shock to the entire family particularly to Mr. Das and he became seriously ill thinking about the ill fate of his beloved daughter’s future.
Finally, Gouribala gave birth to a son on 12.12.1920. The son was named after Mr. Aronnyo Kumar Chakravarti as Dev Das Chakravarti. Thereafter, Mr. Das persistently kept on requesting Mr. Aronnyo to accept Gouribala as his wife and Dev Das as his son but of no avail. In this melee the boy became three years old.
At that time, having no way out Mr. Das begged Mr. Sheikh Luthfur Rahman, his Muhuri (Document Writer) to marry Gouribala. The obedient Muhuri obliged Mr. Das and married Gouribala after she and begotten son Dev Das, sired by Mr. Chakravarti got converted into Islam taking the Muslim names Sahera Begum and Sheikh Mujibur Rahman accordingly.
An affidavit No118 dated 10.11.1923, was registered with the Kolkata Magistrate Court in this regard.

WITNESSES IN THE AFFIDEFIT REGISTERED

1. Mr. Abdur Rahman Shafayet, Court Daroga
Police Station (PS): Vandaria
Post Office: Vandaria
District: Erstwhile Barisal

2. Shree Anil Kumar, Court Daroga
District: Erstwhile Barisal

Madam Prime minister, if the above information is authentic then the public demands that these should be included while writing the birth history of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman. If it is proven otherwise, then we the people urge the government to publish in the text book the name of Maternal Grand Father of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman along with detailed history of his maternal ancestry.

NB: It’s an earnest appeal to every conscious citizen of Bangladesh that each one of you should distribute at least five copies of this Leaflet for conveying the true facts to grow awareness among the younger generation.

Below is the Record achieved from Kolkata High Court Archive:

Mujibs_birth.pdf
111K View Download SHEIKH MUJIBUR RAHMAN’s birth history21.2.11.doc
45K View Download

Unquote
 
The letter obviously was circulated by the political opponents of Sheikha Hasina as a body blow to the image of Bongo Bondhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman.
It was not a fault of Sheikh Mujib that he was sired by a high caste Hindu out of wedlock, or that his mother was a low caste Hindu converted to Islam not by effective proselytization but unsavory and pressing circumstances. These are the man-made measures to elevate or down-grade people in a class-ridden society.
An illustration of  typical sub-continental mind-set and its social value system that gives sinister labels like “Harami”, “Hindu ka nutfa”, “Doghla” and other such epithets. The indecorous truth however is that a good number of so-called ‘shareefzaade’ will fail their paternal validity if put to a DNA test.
Does this low-blow and libelous activity somehow reduce the great feat of founding of Bangladesh by Sheikh Mujib ?